Pairpath
Evidence-based hiring

Prove it.
Don't pitch it.

Skip the interview loop. Run a structured evaluation period instead — real work, weekly check-ins, the same rubric for every candidate. By day 90, you're not guessing.

Built for founder-led teams of 10–75 · Engineering, sales, product, design, ops, data

TS
Tom Smith
Sales Manager
Day 88 of 90
Focus areas
Ran 9 discovery calls · 6 advanced to next stage
Forecast accuracy within 8% across the period
Coached the SDR through 3 outbound revisions
MR
Marcus Rivera
Senior Engineer
Day 34 of 90
Focus areas
Shipped the payments retry behavior · cut failed jobs 38%
Took on-call rotation · handled 2 incidents cleanly
·Reviewing tradeoffs on the migration plan
SC
Sarah Chen
Senior Product Manager
Day 56 of 90
Focus areas
Led the Q3 operating review · clear decisions documented
Drafted the FY27 roadmap with engineering and sales
·Stakeholder alignment on pricing is still in motion
DP
Devon Park
Product Designer
Day 21 of 90
Focus areas
Took onboarding flow from spec to ship in 2 weeks
Ran usability tests with 4 users · clear written notes
·Component library contribution starting next week
The quiet math of hiring

Interviews keep missing. The job is the test.

<15%
Of job performance is explained by unstructured interviews.
Schmidt & Hunter · meta-analysis
46%
Of new hires fail or underperform within 18 months.
Leadership IQ · multi-year study
30%+
Of first-year salary lost on a single mis-hire — before counting team drag.
U.S. Department of Labor
What you'd actually see

Interviews show you a performance. Evaluations show you the work.

Pick the role you're hiring for. On the left, what a candidate says in an interview. On the right, what you'd see in their evaluation period — same person, observable work.

In the interview
"I'm a closer. I overdeliver on quota."
No way to verify. Just the claim, said well.
In the evaluation
What they actually did, week by week.
From open role to confident offer

How an evaluation period actually runs.

Same structure for every candidate. Same rubric, same weekly cadence, same auditable record. So when you're choosing between three people at the end, you're comparing real work — not how three different interviews went.

Senior Account Executive
Focus areas for this evaluation · 90 days
Run live discovery calls with real prospects
Quality of qualification questions · accuracy of next-step framing
Build and pressure-test a target account list
Reasoning behind selection · supporting research
Forecast the quarter accurately
Variance against actual close · forecast hygiene
Coach an SDR through one outbound revision
Clarity of feedback · evidence of uptake

Same structure for every candidate. Same rubric.

3 candidates surfaced
Ranked by demonstrated work, not résumé keywords
JL
Jordan Lee
Closed-loop forecasting, MEDDIC fluency, SDR coaching
94 match
RK
Rachel Kim
Mid-market AE · clean forecasting record · coach background
91 match
EW
Eli Washington
SaaS AE · strong on discovery · light on coaching evidence
82 match
Week 6 check-in · Jordan Lee
"Run live discovery calls" · Both sides log every week
Weeks
How did this week go?
Your note: Ran 3 discovery calls this week. Discovery framework was crisp on 2 of 3 — second call drifted into demo too fast. Recovered well with clean next-step framing.
Jordan Lee · Decision summary
Day 90 of 90 · 12 check-ins logged
Ready for decision
Run live discovery calls
Going well · 11/12 weeks
Build target account list
Going well · 12/12 weeks
Forecast accurately
Within 8% · 3/3 cycles
Coach an SDR
Mixed · 1 strong revision, 1 surface-level
The receipts are attached. Open any verdict and see every check-in, every artifact, every score that produced it. No black box.
One platform, every function

Every role you're hiring this year, under one rubric.

Pairpath evaluates any role where the work is observable — across engineering, sales, product, design, data, and operations. The rubric flexes; the structure doesn't.

Engineering
SWE I–III · Senior · Staff · Eng Manager
Example focus area
"Ship the payments retry behavior and cut failed jobs by 30%."
Sales
SDR · BDR · AE · AM · CSM · Sales Manager
Example focus area
"Run live discovery with real prospects. Forecast the quarter accurately."
Product
APM · PM · Senior PM · Group PM
Example focus area
"Lead the quarterly operating review. Build the FY27 plan with eng and sales."
Design
Product Designer · UX Researcher · Brand
Example focus area
"Take the onboarding flow from spec to ship. Run usability tests with real users."
Data
Analyst · Scientist · Engineer · ML Engineer
Example focus area
"Answer 3 ambiguous business questions with data the team can actually use."
Operations
Ops Analyst · Ops Manager · Chief of Staff
Example focus area
"Run the weekly leadership cadence. Surface what needs attention before it's a fire."

Don't see your role? Custom roles are part of the Scale plan — we'll build the rubric with you.

The quiet ROI

One mis-hire funds Pairpath for years.

Pick the role. Drag the slider. The numbers do the pitching — fitting, because we won't.

Your next hire

Choose a role and salary band.

First-year compensation $220,000
$80K $200K $400K
Cost of one mis-hire
$66,000
Pairpath Team plan
$950 / month
Months covered by avoiding it
69 months
Avoid one bad Account Executive at this comp and Pairpath pays for itself for 69 months — before counting lost pipeline, ramp time, and the rehire itself.
Pricing

Subscribe monthly. Cancel anytime.

No annual lock-in. No per-hire success fees. A flat rate that costs less than one week of the wrong hire.

Founder
$450 / month
For your first critical hires.
  • 2 concurrent evaluation periods
  • 1 role of your choice — built with you
  • Semantic candidate matching
  • Weekly check-ins · full evidence record
  • Email support
Start with Founder
Scale
$1,900 / month
For sustained, multi-role hiring.
  • 15 concurrent evaluation periods
  • Custom roles built with you
  • API access to the evidence record
  • Quarterly calibration reviews
  • Dedicated support channel
Start with Scale

All plans · monthly billing · cancel anytime · evaluation stipends billed at cost

Things people ask

Honest answers to obvious questions.

Yes — the strong ones prefer it. Evaluations are scoped, time-boxed, and paid. Candidates keep a portable evidence record of their work whether you hire them or not. The people who object most are the ones whose résumé was doing the heavy lifting.
A take-home is one artifact, graded by a tired person, with no way to compare across candidates. An evaluation period is real work over weeks, with weekly check-ins, the same rubric for everyone, and every score traceable back to specific evidence.
Evaluation periods are designed to work alongside current employment. Focus areas are scoped to a manageable weekly cadence, and most candidates can complete an evaluation in evenings and weekends, or by negotiating a short transition window with their current employer. We can run shorter evaluation lengths (30, 60 days) when that's the right call.
Any role where the work is observable — IC-level engineering, sales, product, design, data, and operations roles up through senior individual contributor. Executive hires (VP and above) are a different problem; we don't try to evaluate judgment, taste, and political navigation with a 90-day window, and we'll tell you when an evaluation isn't the right tool.
Completely. Every evaluation produces a full evidence record — every check-in, every artifact, every score, and the specific rubric criteria that produced them. You can open any decision and see exactly which evidence produced which outcome. No black box, no gut feel laundered through software.
Yes. Billing is month-to-month and cancellation takes effect at the end of the current cycle. Active evaluation periods run to completion so candidates are never left hanging mid-process.

Stop guessing. Start seeing.

The next résumé on your desk is a claim. Make them prove it.